Another Year, Another COD. BUT How Good is Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3's Multiplayer? [Review]

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 is a game that needs no introduction. The franchise has been around so long, it’s almost old enough to drink (and probably older than over half its fan base). MW3 runs on the same engine as MW2 and Warzone 2.0. Gunplay feels crisp and reactive, and servers are usually stable enough where most interactions feel fair. You’ll still contend with annoying players and unfun map design as a consequence of modern COD’s TTK and how this game ported all of MW2 2009’s maps, nuisances and all. Speaking of nuisances, last year’s annoying UI returns too.

One of the best aspects of Cod MW3 has been the multiplayer.  And here is why. What do you think?  How does MW3 compare to the other current CoD titles?

Why should Multiplayer or Zombies be restricted? The base game, albeit short and anticlimactic, with more questions than answers, continues to demonstrate how disconnected the developers are from the community and what we would consider decent campaign gameplay with decent optimization and less crashes. I haven't played Call of Duty in a long time, but aside from visual visuals and voice acting, it doesn't feel like anything has changed. It's the same on-rails game you remember, just a little less entertaining owing to age.